(BTW: that's not my wife on the left; that's our dog, Nickie in case you were wondering.)
So I pulled out my iPhone and logged in. A coupon popped up on the screen, "15% off your entire order - today only!"
I was thrilled. My wife was looking at several blouses she liked but she thought the price was too high so I told her to pick one out.
What just happened is a harbinger of in-store interactive, personalized marketing in its infancy. I say infancy because logging into a WiFi network will soon be paramount to taking a horse-drawn wagon cross the country rather than a commercial jet.
What is currently happening in some retaiI stores and what I envision will be in all stores eventually in the not too distant future is the following scenario:
My wife and I walk into a department store. The store's WiFi detects our presence from the store's app or MAC addresses on our phones or smartwatches. We had agreed when we loaded the app to allow detection because the feature would provide discounts. We wander over to the men's jeans department.
A text arrives, "Hello Anthony. Interested in jeans today? Buy two pair and get the third pair half off. I decided not to buy the jeans as good as the deal was at the moment.
We head over to the women's section and my wife is looking at dresses. She picks one off the rack.
"Do you like it?" she asks holding it up to her shoulders.
"Yeah, the color accents your hair. You should get it," I said.
"Maybe, it's a bit expensive."
My wife's phone chimes. She takes it out her pocket and reads the text, "Look at that!"
She shows me the text; it was from the store, "Hello Joann. Looking for a new dress? Take 15% off for being a loyal customer."
She buys two dresses.
At home, I grab my tablet and check ESPN for the latest basketball scores for my favorite teams. A display ad from the store we had just visited pops up with the message, "Just for you. Buy two pair of jeans, get the third on us. Today and tomorrow only."
Spooky, but we had agreed to allow the store to access our devices and to receive messages.
What transpired is just one future scenario in marketing. The WiFi in the store detected when we walked into the store and Near Field Communication (NFC) or Bluetooth technology or iBeacons detected when we were near specific clothing racks.
It was like having a virtual digital sales person standing near us with the power to give discounts to close a sale except the sales person is an algorithm. I purchase all my jeans at this particular store and my purchase history is in the store's database as a frequent buyer of jeans. The algorithm detected my profile and pushed out the text message discount to my phone.
This is tracking of customer behavior similar to website analytics only in the physical realm.
All sorts of retailers — including national chains, like Macy's, Nordstrom, American Eagle, Family Dollar, and Cabela’s among others — have been testing these technologies as early as 2013 and using them to optimize store layouts or offer customized coupons, according to The New York Times.
|Screenshot of Nomi Technology's In-Store Customer Analytics Dashboard|
According to a video on Nomi's website, their technology can track the number of customers walking into the store, track where they browse and push relevant messages out to their smart phones.
This is tracking of customer behavior similar to digital website analytics only in the physical realm.
While most consumers are Ok with being tracked online with cookies, database profiles of their buying habits and cookie matching used by most e-commerce retailers, there are those who bristle with anger and fear over being tracked physically.
In a March 2014 survey by Chicago-based Opinion Lab and reported by AdWeek, consumers feel this way about in-store tracking:
- Eight out of 10 consumers don't want to be tracked without giving their explicit consent
- 64 percent said they should only be tracked if they opt-in or sign up to participate in a program
- 24 percent believe retailers shouldn't do any in-store tracking at all
- Promises of a better shopping experience didn't change consumers' minds with 88 percent saying it wouldn’t make any difference
- Discounts or free products would sway consumers towards acceptance of tracking
- 81 percent do not trust retailers to keep their data private and secure
In-store tracking won't go away and what will foster its widespread acceptance are the incentives retailers offer to convince consumers to buy in and reap the fruits of a great discount or free merchandise in exchange for a little less privacy.
What's your take on in-store tracking? Do you feel it is a violation of your privacy or are you Ok with in-store tracking? Feel free to leave a comment.